Asrock Z68 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110518
Uptime27.4 Days
Run DateNov 11 '22 at 19:42
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 158
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 432
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.7% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 68
Parallax 61.1
46% 61.8 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 54
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 397 400 422 382 381 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 437
Write 412
Mixed 399
SusWrite 396
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 34.6
109% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 283
213% 287 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
121GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 108 114 108 101 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 102
Write 115
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 108
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 106%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
231GB free
Firmware: VT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 63.9
Write 69.4
Mixed 46
SusWrite 68
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 38%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
230GB free
Firmware: VT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 65.6
Write 69.6
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 69.5
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
175GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 99 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 86.9
Write 92.6
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 99.4
106% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback