Lenovo 81D1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81D1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 40.4
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 66.5
30% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 89.3
8-Core 108
13% 98.7 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Legend(17AA 398A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7528
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Realtek_sata 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 261 260 260 185 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
Read 286
Write 266
Mixed 237
SusWrite 225
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 20.2
71% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 35.4
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 23.7
36% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81D1 Builds (Compare 465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81D1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback