Lenovo 82KA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82KA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateNov 10 '22 at 17:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 26.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 249
71% 142 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 566
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 21.5
15% 20.1 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 15.7
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme UMIS RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1C0628 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 338 319 211 346 341 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 684
Write 453
Mixed 556
SusWrite 325
113% 505 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 31.7
111% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 558
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 422
309% 413 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 219%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE M471A1G44AB0-CWE 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 8
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 4.1
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 277
14% 277 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82KA Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82KA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback