Toshiba SATELLITE L875-12M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L875-12M  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '22 at 16:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 118
53% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 167
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB41) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 5.3
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 376 254 104 105 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.8% Above average
Read 214
Write 106
Mixed 145
SusWrite 214
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 24.8
88% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 204
160% 216 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L875-12M Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L875-12M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback