Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181018
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateNov 10 '22 at 10:08
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1110
99% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (164 fps cap detected)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 162
Parallax 164
134% 163 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 162
Splatting 164
134% 163 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 127%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 299 283 291 302 290 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 397
Write 275
Mixed 256
SusWrite 294
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 24.9
96% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 197
164% 242 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
584GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1340 1511 1482 1087 1122 1092 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,221
Write 1,938
Mixed 1,368
SusWrite 1,272
380% 1,700 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 50.1
166% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,139
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 251
283% 511 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 246%
Great: 372%
MXSSD3MDSTP-480G 480GB
391GB free
Firmware: 5.0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 288 273 265 281 229 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 406
Write 217
Mixed 230
SusWrite 269
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 17.7
71% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 128
105% 154 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 154 153 156 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 150
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 155
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AR32C16S8K2SU416R 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 27.6
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 30.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback