Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '22 at 09:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 188
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 477
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E215) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 27.6
14% 21.1 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 13.8
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 63 35 35 38 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 288
Write 261
Mixed 208
SusWrite 70.6
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 26.9
89% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 151
147% 234 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 108%
SDVPSA181024 240GB
149GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 347 80 97 112 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 268
Write 221
Mixed 222
SusWrite 183
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 15.4
67% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 44
54% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung V-GeN D4S4GL32A16TS V-GeN D4S4GL32A16TS Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.5% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 24.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback