Lenovo 20351

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20351  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A2
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 18:36
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 97.6
49% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 141
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0303B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 338 377 336 347 343 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 439
Write 342
Mixed 373
SusWrite 346
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 18.5
88% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 77.9
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 31.6
68% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 166%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
377GB free
Firmware: AM0Q5E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 94 100 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 77.6
Write 102
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 97.3
54% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 RMT3170EF68F9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20351 Builds (Compare 1,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20351

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback