Dell OptiPlex 3020

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3020  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 15:49
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 35.8
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 172
50% 96 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 321
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 197 143 90 75 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 298
Write 253
Mixed 214
SusWrite 139
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 13.5
57% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 1.4
63% 145 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
320GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 89 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 96.7
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 90.4
100% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3020 Builds (Compare 6,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback