Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 08 '22 at 13:39
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 145
2-Core 287
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,069
98% 821 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 158
Parallax 162
135% 162 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 138
Splatting 122
120% 151 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 367 130 125 121 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 320
Write 315
Mixed 247
SusWrite 190
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 37.1
127% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 334
256% 348 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 123%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
111GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 128 133 133 133 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 290
Write 131
Mixed 170
SusWrite 130
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 25.6
107% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 117
103% 156 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 182 194 185 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 104
Write 134
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 184
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
315GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 145 148 150 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 85.5
Write 141
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 146
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 106%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
913GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 51.7
Write 29.1
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 34.2
45% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
83% 2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 33.1
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 30.5
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,087
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback