Foxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '22 at 12:12
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 178
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 401
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 77.3
44% 63.7 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 43.9
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 160 267 73 92 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 363
Write 327
Mixed 305
SusWrite 110
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 19.3
95% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 0.9
19% 43 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
642GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 197 213 211 218 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.5% Above average
Read 227
Write 218
Mixed 204
SusWrite 212
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 33.7
104% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 79.5
DQ Mixed 47.5
39% 54 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 128%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
387GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 85 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 70
Write 69.6
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 85.4
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67MP-S/-V/H67MP Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Foxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback