Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 23:23
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 824
75% 629 Pts
64-Core 1155
72% 1155 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.47
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 197
Reflection 297
Parallax 363
160% 286 fps
Gravity 265
Splatting 140
171% 203 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 481 483 488 488 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 491
Mixed 454
SusWrite 483
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 60.3
197% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 197 197 199 194 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 154
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 196
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 56.7
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 47.7
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback