Tarox Business PC 3200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemTarox Business PC 3200  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 00:00
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 179
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 454
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 112
Parallax 101
81% 104 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 101
Splatting 101
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 386 429 441 448 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 363
Write 156
Mixed 379
SusWrite 343
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 36.3
130% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 195
168% 244 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 100%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
22GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 156 68 51 50 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.1% Above average
Read 257
Write 198
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 79.4
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 27.7
91% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 142
120% 175 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
289GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 85.6
Write 68.4
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 79.1
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 61%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
100GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 62 63 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 88.9
Write 96.7
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 62
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 57%
Seagate Basic 1TB
85GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 41 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 40.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 39.4
28% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Basic 2TB
193GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 39 39 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 50.1
Write 36.2
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 38.7
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Business PC 3200 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Tarox Business PC 3200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback