Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 170 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 565 54% 445 Pts	64-Core 818 51% 818 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XFX(1682 9470) CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.8% Below average	Lighting 47.9 Reflection 60.3 Parallax 68.8 39% 59 fps	MRender 58.7 Gravity 52.9 Splatting 43.2 41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN15ABHA 256GB 1,835 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6T3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 430 Write 396 Mixed 352 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 33.4 114% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 247 212% 312 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
MB2000EBUCF 2TB 645 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: HPG3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 34 34 33 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 119 Write 36.9 Mixed 42.9 SusWrite 32.7 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix-00AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 4x16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	68.6% Good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 24.3 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 11 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	131x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	75x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373