Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 49.5 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 131 50% 88 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 274 28% 229 Pts	64-Core 293 18% 293 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Lighting 71.4 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 87.7 58% 75.3 fps	MRender 71.4 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 56.5 53% 66.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 416 Write 306 Mixed 248 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 71.9 4K Mixed 25.2 105% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 254 213% 309 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 447GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 166 171 169 173 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 144 Write 118 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 169 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix-00AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 4x16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 15.5 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 9.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 163 25% 163 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	131x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	75x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373