HP 850-060se

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 850-060se  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B3A
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150511
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 17:46
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 614
58% 483 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Device(1B0A 90F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1642 MHz, MLim: 1977 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.5
8% 6.35 fps
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 32 39 48 50 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 458
Write 35.5
Mixed 103
SusWrite 50
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 20.4
64% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 68.6
DQ Mixed 41.2
60% 117 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 189 190 188 189 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 155
Mixed 85
SusWrite 189
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.4% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 21.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 18.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 850-060se Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: HP 850-060se

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback