Chuwi GemiBook Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemChuwi GemiBook Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardJS131 Default string
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 17:42
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 103
40% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 154
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 3.8
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 240 327 284 325 176 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 346
Write 317
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 259
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 10.8
44% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 0.3
51% 119 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GemiBook Pro Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi GemiBook Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback