Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 15:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 177
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 300
38% 290 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Sapphire(174B 1645) 2GB
CLim: 915 MHz, MLim: 1080 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 15
10% 13.4 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 12.6
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dst6256-ssd 256GB 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2206XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 44 45 58 47 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 414
Write 418
Mixed 168
SusWrite 49.5
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 19.8
83% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 68.8
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 116
103% 148 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
61GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 68 53 72 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 91
Write 92.4
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 77
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PBC HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-HD3 Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback