Intel NUC10i5FNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) NUC10i5FNH
MotherboardIntel NUC10i5FNB  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 13:18
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 205
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 454
51% 400 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 199
Parallax 208
178% 208 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 150
Splatting 123
130% 164 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 149%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 54 54 56 63 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 1,060
Write 758
Mixed 695
SusWrite 112
146% 656 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 46.6
164% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 185
151% 208 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 110%
Great: 209%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$55
55GB free
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 114 78 122 116 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 426
Write 320
Mixed 281
SusWrite 135
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 17.9
70% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 76.3
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 40.8
42% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 55%
WD Elements 25A1 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 83 80 86 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 79.1
Write 66.6
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 80.6
100% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 Kingston 9905700-025.A00G 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.3% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 20.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC10i5FNB Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC10i5FNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback