Gigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 12:55
Run Duration75 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KS
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 274
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 1,011
94% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,594
99% 1,594 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 270
Parallax 289
226% 279 fps
MRender 323
Gravity 237
Splatting 182
195% 248 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 193%
Great: 225%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1XHE-00AFY0 1TB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614900WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,122
Write 1,913
Mixed 1,696
426% 1,910 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 76.3
261% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 1,162
871% 1,169 MB/s
Poor: 226% Great: 607%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 25.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 30.7
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 51.3
78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $581
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback