Gigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 19 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '22 at 12:42
Run Duration	77 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KS 12,840 User benchmarks, average bench 99% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Memory 92.2 1-Core 146 2-Core 283 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 1,040 95% 796 Pts	64-Core 1,558 96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Zotac(19DA 2612) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	196% Outstanding	Lighting 284 Reflection 271 Parallax 292 231% 282 fps	MRender 325 Gravity 239 Splatting 184 196% 249 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 225%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS100T1XHE-00AFY0 1TB 4,117 User benchmarks, average bench 407% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 614900WD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,580 Write 2,418 Mixed 2,189 534% 2,396 MB/s	4K Read 63.5 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 81.2 284% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 1,254 DQ Write 1,032 DQ Mixed 1,152 860% 1,146 MB/s
Poor: 226% Great: 607%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.5% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 19.2 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 22.9 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $242Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	657x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	449x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	447x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	231x
RTX 3070Nvidia $455Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	190x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	119x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	128x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	113x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	107x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	196x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	94x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	79x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $535

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16