Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '17 at 20:48
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 646
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 804
50% 804 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 206
Parallax 188
133% 185 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 183
Splatting 125
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,067
Write 1,797
Mixed 1,654
410% 1,839 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 48.1
178% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 174
167% 265 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 261%
Great: 353%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$237
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 237
Mixed 181
154% 206 MB/s
4K Read 6.98
4K Write 3.04
4K Mixed 0.4
392% 3.48 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 126%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
240GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 115
Mixed 117
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.21
57% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
84GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 102
Write 109
Mixed 97
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.35
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 33.3
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $733
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback