| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190514 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 05 '22 at 03:53 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | SGP-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$94
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
84% 149 Pts
|
69% 543 Pts
|
41% 659 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
114%
Outstanding
|
120% 144 fps
|
112% 141 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASE12NVME256 256GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM14.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 174 207 169 160 168 MB/s
|
65% 286 MB/s
|
61% 25.3 MB/s
|
290% 376 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA960CV10001 960GB
327GB free
Firmware: N010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 26 26 27 MB/s
|
33.8%
Below average
|
50% 223 MB/s
|
63% 17.8 MB/s
|
20% 33.8 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
675GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 161 166 167 157 MB/s
|
60.6%
Good
|
67% 92.1 MB/s
|
105% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown KD48GU88C-26N190A 0898 KD48GU88A-26N1600 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
75.4%
Very good
|
77% 27 GB/s
|
60% 20.9 GB/s
|
60% 66.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310CM-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,141 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $94Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 332x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 154x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 66x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 88x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 74x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 73x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $277 |