Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 19 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '22 at 04:39
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 90.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 243 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 657 72% 571 Pts	64-Core 691 43% 691 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Zotac(19DA 4509) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 146 Parallax 145 117% 145 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 126 Splatting 113 112% 140 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ASE12NVME256 256GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8TM14.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 329 254 248 229 326 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 148 Write 239 Mixed 591 SusWrite 277 72% 314 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 87.7 4K Mixed 46.3 162% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 570 DQ Write 439 DQ Mixed 206 235% 405 MB/s
Poor: 97% Great: 189%
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA960CV10001 960GB 1,479 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 411GB free Firmware: N010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 401 402 412 412 407 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Read 345 Write 194 Mixed 308 SusWrite 405 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 36.3 132% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 195 168% 246 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 683GB free Firmware: A750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 159 163 163 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 57.4 Write 149 Mixed 33 SusWrite 160 72% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KD48GU88C-26N190A 0898 KD48GU88A-26N1600 16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 24.6 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 33.4 SC Mixed 23.9 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	332x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	154x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	66x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	88x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	74x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	73x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	22x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	21x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
1x16GBUnknownBench 53%, 15,722 samples	26x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16