Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemNotebook W65KJ1_KK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65KJ1_KK1
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 12:01
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 191
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 313
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Clevo(1558 651A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 6.3
5% 17.6 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00007 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7202Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,073
Write 897
Mixed 959
218% 976 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 32.9
106% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 601
438% 574 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 293%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 135
Write 113
Mixed 34.6
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.6
Write 6
Mixed 7.5
12% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
130% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65KJ1_KK1 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback