MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive523% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 01:19
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 156
2-Core 311
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 933
94% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Lighting 243
Reflection 220
Parallax 206
198% 223 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 152
Splatting 138
127% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 159%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
467GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3915 4027 3962 4087 1415 316 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
523% Outstanding
Read 4,264
Write 4,253
Mixed 3045
SusWrite 2,954
815% 3,629 MB/s
4K Read 79
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 98.7
366% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,604
DQ Write 1113
DQ Mixed 1,404
1,036% 1,374 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 523%
Great: 623%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
31GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 138 141 140 140 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 159
Write 137
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 140
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 1
36% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 108 108 109 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 190
Write 165
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 109
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
214GB free, PID b157
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 38.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 39.1
50% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
69% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08RHJJ40-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 38.2
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,038
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback