HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory44.8 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '17 at 16:18
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 70
2-Core 143
54% 93 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 608
52% 448 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800
Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.0
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
6.74% Terrible
Lighting 8.93
Reflection 8.62
Parallax 4.09
7% 7.21 fps
MRender 8.48
Gravity 7
Splatting 5.91
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.74%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 379
Write 324
Mixed 319
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 29.1
79% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 75
79% 133 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
255GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 169
Write 113
Mixed 103
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.31
73% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 109%
FUJITSU 15K RPM SAS 147GB
91GB free
Firmware: HPF1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 109
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.37
4K Write 3.42
4K Mixed 1.09
242% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 67%
FUJITSU 15K RPM SAS 147GB
87GB free
Firmware: HPF1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 109
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.33
4K Write 3.13
4K Mixed 0.67
188% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback