Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 2,341 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 161 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 616 56% 468 Pts	64-Core 797 49% 797 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 290X 3,695 User benchmarks, average bench 49% AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56% Above average	Lighting 69.6 Reflection 58.7 Parallax 84.5 57% 70.9 fps	MRender 59 Gravity 62.2 Splatting 74.8 54% 65.3 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
FUJITSU 15K RPM SAS 147GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPF1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 51 52 52 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 59.8 Write 59.3 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 47 42% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.3 227% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 801GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 62 65 66 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 68.3 Write 51 Mixed 20 SusWrite 63.5 37% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 44% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 921GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 31 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 60.8 Write 26.8 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 30.4 28% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2GB free Firmware: 0A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 97.5 Write 94.8 Mixed 72 66% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 58GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.1% Good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 25.1 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16