Besstar UM350

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemBesstar UM350  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR UM350
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 10:41
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 171
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 444
44% 361 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.15021.11005
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.9% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 9
Parallax 12.8
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 8.8
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vickter NVMe 512GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220303a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 961 1364 1414 1492 869 458 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 1,833
Mixed 1,525
SusWrite 1,093
334% 1,479 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 39.5
134% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 286
214% 287 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 180%
Great: 266%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
143GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 359 306 128 141 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 463
Write 391
Mixed 380
SusWrite 221
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 14.4
67% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 25.7
62% 128 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.C8FR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.1% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 25.8
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM350 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar UM350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback