Biostar H81MHV3L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3L  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '22 at 19:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 501
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 379 89 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 399
Write 373
Mixed 312
SusWrite 190
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 25.8
101% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 91.4
DQ Mixed 33.6
33% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-075.A00LF 99U5471-036.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81MHV3L Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback