PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | ASRock FATAL1TY Z170 GAMING K4 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160706 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 02 '22 at 17:50 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 79% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
608GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 371 428 456 455 454 MB/s
|
97.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD740ADFS-00SLR5 74GB
24GB free
Firmware: 21.07QR5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 67 68 70 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.7%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6600KIntel $113Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 344x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 300x |
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 78x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 174x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 113x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 69x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $831 |