Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 89.1 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 116 58% 90.6 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 187 22% 172 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 881A) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	6.53% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 8.5 Parallax 9.2 6% 8.57 fps	MRender 10.1 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 7 6% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.53% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Glowy 128GB 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200326 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 122 13 37 69 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.3% Poor	Read 132 Write 142 Mixed 178 SusWrite 67 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 4.8 50% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 29.2 DQ Write 60.3 DQ Mixed 15.3 20% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-025.A00LF 04EF Team-Elite-1333 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 14.7 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	5x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x

RAM
99U5471-025.A00LF 04EF Team-Elite-1333 8GBKingstonBench 45%, 5 samples	4x
ACR512X64D3U16C11G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 480 samples	2x
Team-Elite-1333 1x4GBTeamBench 24%, 611 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16