Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 7 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201021
Uptime	8.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '22 at 14:33
Run Duration	321 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 72.1 1-Core 134 2-Core 267 85% 158 Pts	4-Core 514 8-Core 790 81% 652 Pts	64-Core 1,006 62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Lighting 72.3 Reflection 74.5 Parallax 68.1 59% 71.6 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 71.3 Splatting 66.5 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59 34,063 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: SS0328D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2372 Write 1,009 Mixed 142 253% 1,174 MB/s	4K Read 64.8 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 83.7 284% 98.9 MB/s	DQ Read 834 DQ Write 469 DQ Mixed 297 316% 533 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 271%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 56GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 276 Write 128 Mixed 126 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 14.1 60% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 24.2 DQ Mixed 22.2 17% 23 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Ramsta S600 480GB 325 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 170GB free Firmware: RS47V0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 471 Write 401 Mixed 377 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 90.1 4K Mixed 21.3 116% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 99.2 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 24.3 52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 93%
Kingdian S200 60GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 30GB free Firmware: R0522A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 275 Write 216 Mixed 214 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 89.5 4K Mixed 18.3 114% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 48.4 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 22.9 44% 83 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 69%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 213GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 47.6 Write 54.8 Mixed 44.5 37% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 49%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 421GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 110 Write 60.8 Mixed 73.6 61% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.3 228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 75%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 61GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 82.7 Write 89.6 Mixed 49.9 55% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
Jesis M1 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 34GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 236 Write 38.2 Mixed 92.1 122% 122 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 7 476% 8.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 63%
USB Disk 3.0 2TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2TB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 18.7 Mixed 9.2 14% 14 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 53% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
SMI USB DISK 32GB 2,654 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 28GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 21.7 Write 17.2 Mixed 20.4 25% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.5 66% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.2% Very good	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 28.8 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 27.3 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	507x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	488x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	362x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $699

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16