Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 10:06
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 450
51% 397 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 28.4
16% 24.4 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 23.9
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 240 273 278 264 292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 470
Write 208
Mixed 189
SusWrite 264
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 35
138% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 122
125% 207 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 89%
Samsung 470 Series SSD 64GB
22GB free
Firmware: AXM0701Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 142 139 118 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 227
Write 179
Mixed 149
SusWrite 136
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 17
64% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 34.3
DQ Mixed 20.5
30% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 43%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB
309GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 91 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 126
Write 77.5
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 89.4
104% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 72%
WDC WD10 EALS-002BA0 1TB
350GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 92 93 93 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.5% Average
Read 126
Write 74.2
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 89.1
127% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.43 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback