Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '22 at 08:37
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 359 47% 354 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.32% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 4.8 5% 5.03 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.32% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 PRO 1TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 437 450 442 408 340 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 450 Write 425 Mixed 367 SusWrite 419 94% 415 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 44.6 149% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 335 258% 352 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 PRO 256GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 486GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 439 452 443 426 428 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 461 Mixed 384 SusWrite 437 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 51.9 169% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 342 262% 355 MB/s
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB 16,539 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 26.8 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 17.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	481x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	79x
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	92x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $705

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16