CDM P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemCDM P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 07:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 183
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 404
44% 351 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 111
Parallax 101
85% 106 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 100
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M6M 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 349 378 379 403 403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 455
Write 381
Mixed 286
SusWrite 380
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 30.1
110% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 214
191% 289 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
136GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 124 125 130 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 105
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 127
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: CDM P8Q77-M2/CDM/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback