Asrock Z77 Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 16:01
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 213
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 524
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1934 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 38.8
31% 39.7 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 28.4
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 417
Mixed 345
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 36.6
135% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 170
160% 245 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 9 144 24" 1920 1017 BNQ7F31 BenQ XL2411Z
Typical Z77 Pro3 Builds (Compare 1,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro3 - $212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback