Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 13:18
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 183
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 491
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 15E0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 32
25% 31.2 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 20.4
23% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 431
Write 263
Mixed 220
67% 305 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 22.8
91% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 188
175% 273 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 83%
Toshiba MK2561GSYN 250GB-$19
112GB free
Firmware: MH000C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 73.5
Write 70.2
Mixed 24.6
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-009.A00G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 19.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback