Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 35.3 1-Core 13.3 2-Core 27.4 18% 25.3 Pts	4-Core 33.3 8-Core 54.7 5% 44 Pts	64-Core 42 3% 42 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 0807) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 3.2 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 153 152 147 139 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 422 Write 352 Mixed 311 SusWrite 171 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 13.2 68% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 66.7 DQ Mixed 171 105% 115 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 115%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 93GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 87 77 99 91 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 59.6 Write 85.2 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 85.8 55% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 15.6 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	24x
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	19x
GeForce GT 720MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,823 samples	3x
GeForce 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 9,266 samples	3x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 1,256 samples	3x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,133 samples	2x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	2x