Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	44.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210119
Uptime	9.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '22 at 11:54
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 86.1 1-Core 143 2-Core 267 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 942 89% 740 Pts	64-Core 1,415 88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37A2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 166 Parallax 170 134% 167 fps	MRender 177 Gravity 147 Splatting 127 120% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,992 Write 1,946 Mixed 1,482 403% 1,807 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 51.9 174% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 837 DQ Write 469 DQ Mixed 687 502% 664 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB 20,788 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 812GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 187 186 188 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	38% Below average	Read 244 Write 214 Mixed 115 SusWrite 187 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 1.1 62% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 8.6 DQ Mixed 1.6 2% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 4x16GB 1,002 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	66.7% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 21.2 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 21.1 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	967x
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	286x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	107x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	105x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	139x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $813

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16