Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 16:41
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 1,001
92% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,412
87% 1,412 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 179
Parallax 170
151% 178 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 138
Splatting 119
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 421 303 277 283 261 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1602
Write 1,586
Mixed 1,293
SusWrite 408
274% 1,222 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 77.6
270% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,265
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 1,002
778% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 222%
Great: 237%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
205GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 910 912 911 909 909 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,453
Write 926
Mixed 888
SusWrite 911
233% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 76.2
270% 96.3 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 224
272% 462 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 223%
Great: 242%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
410GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 264 260 260 259 258 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 442
Mixed 376
SusWrite 285
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 47.5
162% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 198
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 111%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
6GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 493
Write 430
Mixed 368
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 40.4
148% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 168
129% 175 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 35.2
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 35.8
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback