Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemGigabyte H87-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 08:45
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 186
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 287
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$600
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
182% Outstanding
Lighting 262
Reflection 223
Parallax 260
214% 248 fps
MRender 291
Gravity 225
Splatting 164
178% 227 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 182%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 210 276 290 326 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 415
Write 407
Mixed 341
SusWrite 289
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 41.2
132% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
152GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 215 288 319 387 376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 375
Write 412
Mixed 302
SusWrite 308
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 37.8
128% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 175
178% 288 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
294GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 216 288 319 387 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 400
Mixed 343
SusWrite 308
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 44.8
151% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 349
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 134%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
455GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 60 59 61 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 57.4
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 59.8
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3L/8GX KHX1600C10D3L/8GX 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback