Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '17 at 15:26
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 96.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 426
58% 430 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Nvidia(10DE 17C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 114
Parallax 103
87% 108 fps
MRender 90.5
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 80
72% 89.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_ Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB
76GB free
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.1% Very good
Read 261
Write 254
Mixed 258
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 34.4
115% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 77.1
88% 150 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 112%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 399
Mixed 412
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 44.8
149% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 116
147% 263 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
38GB free
Firmware: GM4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 87
Mixed 72.2
62% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.44
101% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
6GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 85.1
Write 81.4
Mixed 79
62% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.56
102% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 68%
HDD 250GB
91GB free, PID 2551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 28.9
Mixed 12.3
29% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 134%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
17GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 57.8
Write 56.7
Mixed 32.1
60% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.16
45% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 42%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
16GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 111
Write 96.3
Mixed 55.4
106% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.2
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 60%
HDD 500GB
3GB free, PID 2551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 28.2
Mixed 29.8
38% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.41
68% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 21.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback