Foxconn H87MX/H87MX-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H87MX/H87MX-D  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 15:46
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 143
57% 96 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 254
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 95.4
Parallax 62.3
53% 74.4 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 61.9
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 23 19 31 35 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 318
Write 226
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 33.3
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 1.2
36% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 1.3
19% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 102%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 99 97 99 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 88.2
Write 58.5
Mixed 67
SusWrite 97.6
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050. 1324 F641GU67G160 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87MX/H87MX-D Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H87MX/H87MX-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback