Exper ACTIVEDEX299

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemExper ACTIVEDEX299  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-D/Exper/SI
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170321
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 06:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 185
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 276
35% 265 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 0561) 2GB
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.10.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 41.8
25% 34.3 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 35.1
Splatting 29.3
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hyperx Fury 3D 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 284
Mixed 8.7
53% 243 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 7.9
40% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
929GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 204 204 205 206 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 185
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 205
115% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 118%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBR2 12GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.1% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ACTIVEDEX299 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Exper ACTIVEDEX299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback