bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2732 x 1536 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 23:15
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43% Average
Memory 59
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 151
54% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 143
21% 152 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 43%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 18.0.1.53056
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.6% Average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 190
38% 93.5 fps
MRender 74.3
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 100
64% 75.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 500GB
243GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 616 618 691 619 581 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 835
Write 562
Mixed 366
SusWrite 611
133% 594 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 15
44% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 239
183% 253 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 195%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 19.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback