Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 18:52
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 645
72% 564 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.7% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 40.9
Parallax 40
36% 41.8 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 32.7
40% 50.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 279 278 283 275 268 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 463
Mixed 434
SusWrite 282
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 54.7
171% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
496GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 172 172 166 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 179
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 169
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 20.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 22
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback