Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 11:57
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 603
70% 542 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.2% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 92
Parallax 21.4
35% 52 fps
MRender 91.1
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 41.8
48% 61.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 308 294 307 311 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 322
Mixed 291
SusWrite 304
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 36.4
160% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 244
212% 317 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
504GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 127 111 74 73 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 29
Write 74.5
Mixed 42
SusWrite 99.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 24
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback