Asus Z87-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z87-A  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime5 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 03:01
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 175
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 304
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 2 11 2.8 13 1.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 0.7
Write 27.9
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 5.6
2% 8.73 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
111GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 250 220 277 144 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.5% Below average
Read 163
Write 96.7
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 192
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 9.8
38% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
104GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 102 100 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 110
Write 114
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 101
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.4
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-A Builds (Compare 2,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-A - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $773
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback