Equus-computer-systems Nobilis

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemEquus-computer-systems Nobilis  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z11PR-D16 Series
Memory124.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220210
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 15:51
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4210
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 167
53% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 645
59% 493 Pts
64-Core 2,098
130% 2,098 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_5300_MTFDDAK960TDS 960GB
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D3MU001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 384 381 376 370 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 297
Write 400
Mixed 298
SusWrite 377
78% 343 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 29.8
110% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 286
210% 272 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 106%
Micron_5300_MTFDDAK960TDS 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: D3MU001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 384 382 375 370 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 306
Write 405
Mixed 305
SusWrite 377
79% 348 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 29.4
112% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 289
210% 270 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 106%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 123TB
114.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 13 12 14 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.52% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 15.7
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 13.3
13% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
276% 2.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2R1 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.5% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 6.4
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 402%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback