Itmediaconsult Pentino_H-Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemItmediaconsult Pentino_H-Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 14:24
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 216
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 521
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 62.3
53% 65.8 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 55.4
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 344 345 355 356 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 439
Mixed 400
SusWrite 358
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 45.8
152% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%
OOS1000G 1TB
159GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 127 126 128 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 119
Write 79.7
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 127
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB88B7N-DI 1311 M2F4G64CB88B7N-DI 1311 M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 1311 M2F4G64CB88B7N-DI 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pentino_H-Series Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Itmediaconsult Pentino_H-Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback